Reference architecture: multi-agent platform

ReferenceLast reviewed Oct 16, 2026By Himanshu Ramchandani
Short answer

A production agent platform has a front end, an API that accepts goals and returns run IDs, an orchestrator that manages agent state as a graph, workers that execute steps from a queue, a tool registry with sandboxes, a model gateway for every LLM call, an approval service for risky actions, persistent checkpoints, and tracing, metrics and budgets for every run. The agents are a small part of the code. Most of the platform is what keeps them observable, limited and recoverable.

Architecture

front end ──> API (goal in, run ID out)
                 │
                 ▼
            queue ──> workers
                        │
                        ▼
              orchestrator (state graph)
         planner → coder → tester → reviewer
                │          │          │
                ▼          ▼          ▼
          model gateway  tool registry + sandbox  approval service
                │          │                         │
                └──────────┴──────────┬──────────────┘
                                      ▼
                    checkpoints (Postgres), traces, metrics, budgets

Components

Component Example choices
Front end Next.js with a component library, on a managed platform
API FastAPI
Orchestrator LangGraph state graphs
Persistence Postgres for state and checkpoints
Queue and workers Celery, Redis queues or a cloud queue
Model gateway LiteLLM or similar
Tools Registry plus sandboxed execution in containers
Approvals Web UI or Slack interrupts
Observability Langfuse for traces, Prometheus and Grafana for metrics

Key decisions

  • Agent roles and contracts: what each agent receives and must return. For a software factory: planner, coder, tester, reviewer.
  • Where people approve: merges, deployments, anything irreversible.
  • Per-run budgets for steps, tokens, money and time. See agent cost control.
  • What happens on failure: replan, retry with a hint, or stop and report. See agent state and recovery.
  • Whether you need several agents at all. See multi-agent systems.

Failure modes to test

  • Agents looping without progress.
  • An agent passing a bad result that the next agent trusts.
  • Tool calls outside the agent's permissions.
  • Lost runs after a worker restart.
  • Cost per run growing with each version.

Metrics

  • Run success rate.
  • Steps and cost per successful run.
  • Approval rejection rate.
  • Time to resume after a failure.

From the floor

Agent Forge, the second artifact of AI Engineer HQ cohort 2, was a multi-agent software factory with planner, coder, reviewer and tester agents, each with its own versioned prompt, plus a metrics configuration for judging the system and test cases. Its production version used Vercel for the front end, a back end with a list of workers, LiteLLM for model calls, Docker, Prometheus and Grafana for monitoring, Langfuse for tracing every LLM call, and GitHub Actions for CI/CD.

In the demo, when the tester found an issue in the generated code, the run paused and offered three options, replan, stop, or retry with a hint from the user, and choosing replan sent it back to the planner.

Sources